false
Catalog
0822 - Metric 307 | Patients with Acceptable Quali ...
0822 - Metric 307 | Patients with Acceptable Quali ...
0822 - Metric 307 | Patients with Acceptable Quality of Life Outcome at 30 Days Based on KCCQ Summary Score
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Welcome to the STS ACC TVT Registry August 22 case scenario. This month we will review metric 307, patients with acceptable quality of life outcome at 30 days based on KCCQ summary score. An 87-year-old patient with severe aortic stenosis and severely calcified leaflets presented for elective TAVR. During his TAVR procedure and post-deployment significant paravalvular leak was observed. The decision was made to perform balloon valvuloplasty and immediately after he became hypotensive with decreased respirations. Imaging revealed an annular rupture thought to be from calcifications that extended into the ventricle. A pericardial drain was placed which returned 500 milliliters of blood. However, despite other attempts to stabilize the patient, the patient ultimately expired on the procedure table. As a data analyst, would you expect this patient to be in the denominator? Please take a few moments to review the documentation and the question prior to making a final selection. And the answer is number two, yes. Per the 30-day follow-up Executive Summary Measures and Metrics Companion Guide, patients with TAVR comprise the denominator. There are no denominator exceptions. Additionally, the only denominator exclusions are records where the indexed TAVR procedure was aborted, the lab visit was not the first TAVR visit, and where the patient was enrolled in an NCDR ACC research study where a study device was used. Therefore, patients who are deceased at discharge meet denominator and are evaluated. So you may be asking yourself, but since the patient was deceased at discharge, I cannot do a follow-up on them, nor can I perform a follow-up KCCQ. So why are they included? Well, that boils down to the purpose of the metric. The purpose of the metric is to inform sites which patients are considered alive and well since their procedure. In other words, the metric first scans for patients who are alive at their 30-day follow-up. If a patient is deceased prior to their follow-up, they are not alive nor well and will not meet the numerator. Only then, if identified as alive, will the metric scan for other numerator criteria that identifies them as well, which includes the KCCQ. The metric is not tracking KCCQ performance. It only reviews the KCCQ results, if available, to determine if the alive patient is considered well. Thank you for viewing the August 2022 STS-ACC TBT Registry Case Scenario. See you next month!
Video Summary
In this video, the presenter discusses a case scenario from the STS ACC TVT Registry. The case involves an 87-year-old patient with severe aortic stenosis who underwent an elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. During the procedure, a significant paravalvular leak was observed, leading to the decision to perform balloon valvuloplasty. However, the patient experienced complications and ultimately died on the procedure table. The video then focuses on the question of whether this patient should be included in the denominator of metric 307, which measures patients with acceptable quality of life outcomes at 30 days based on KCCQ summary score. The answer is yes, despite the patient's death, as the metric first considers patients who are alive at their 30-day follow-up. The purpose of the metric is to identify patients who are alive and well since their procedure, and KCCQ results are only reviewed if the patient is alive.
Keywords
video
STS ACC TVT Registry
aortic stenosis
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
paravalvular leak
×
Please select your language
1
English